You may recall that, a couple of years ago,
the English press was full of reports of the Will case of Ilott v Mitson.
(For some background on the case, see my 2015 and 2017 blogs about it.)
The case was of interest to any testator who
is considering cutting out children from their Will. However the Ilott
case has now been applied in the more recent case of Nahajec v Fowle [2017] EW
Misc 11 (CC), in which another impecunious child applied to the court and was
successful in obtaining provision from her father’s estate, contrary to her
father’s express wish that she should receive nothing. So what can the Nahajec case teach us about whether it
is possible, even, for parents to successfully exclude adult children from
receiving any inheritance from them?